Review Article (Published On: 20-Aug-2021 )
DOI : https://doi.org/10.54364/AAIML.2021.1109János Végh
Adv. Artif. Intell. Mach. Learn., 1 (2):136-154
1. János Végh: Kalimános BT, Komlóssy u 26, Debrecen, 4032, Hungary
DOI: 10.54364/AAIML.2021.1109
Article History: Received on: 19-Jul-21, Accepted on: 05-Aug-21, Published on: 20-Aug-21
Corresponding Author: János Végh
Email: Vegh.Janos@gmail.com
Citation: János Végh and Ádám József Berki . Why Learning and Machine Learning Are Different. Advances in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. 2021;1(2):9.
Abstract
Machine learning intends to be a biology-mimicking learning method, implemented by means of technical computing. Their
technology and methods, however, differ very much; mainly because technological computing is based on the time-unaware
classic computing paradigm. Based on the time-aware computing paradigm, the paper discovers the mechanism of biological
information storing and learning; furthermore, it explains, why biological and technological information handling and learning
are entirely different. The consequences of the huge difference in transmission speed in those computing systems may remain
hidden in "toy"-level technological systems but comes to the light in systems having large size and/or mimicking neuronal
operations. The biology-mimicking technological operations are in resemblance to the biological operations only when using
time-unaware computing paradigm. The difference leads also to the need of introducing "training" mode (with desperately low
efficiency) in technological learning, while biological systems have the ability of life-long learning. It is at least misleading to
use technological learning methods to complement biological learning studies. The examples show evidence for the effect of
transmission time in published experiments.
Statistics
Article Views: 1729
PDF Downloads: 13
